# Worked example and rubric

Case 1: A supplies evidence about calendars and updates, with no rescheduling evidence. B supplies a rescheduling example, with no evidence about calendars or outcomes. C supplies only a broad claim. These notes do not establish a winner. Give everyone the same work scenario and assess specific actions. A missing example does not prove inability.

- [ ] Each criterion has an exact quotation or a “no information” label.
- [ ] No invented experience, skills or achievements.
- [ ] Each gap has a specific work-related follow-up question.
- [ ] Case 2 flags A’s unsupported promise, preserves B’s uncertainty and identifies C’s missing answer.
- [ ] A human makes the hiring decision; AI output is material to review.
